You submit.
The agents work.
You get a report.

Yes. Our AI agents autonomously run recon, active exploitation attempts, and report generation. They use the same tools a human pen tester would — nmap, nuclei, sqlmap, ffuf, and more — but orchestrated by AI that can chain findings and reason about what to try next. Human review happens before any report goes out.

For most common vulnerability classes — yes, often more thorough, because AI doesn't get tired or skip steps. Where human testers have an edge is in highly custom business logic flaws that require deep domain understanding. That's why our Breach tier includes human review and a debrief call.

No. The intake form is plain English. The report has a non-technical executive summary at the top. You can hand the technical sections to a developer.

Active testing can sometimes cause unexpected behavior on fragile systems. We recommend running tests against a staging environment for Probe and Breach tiers if you're concerned about uptime.

Yes — penetration testing with written authorization from the system owner is legal. That's why we require the authorization agreement before starting. Testing without authorization is illegal, which is why we don't do it.

You still get a report. "No critical findings" is a valid result and worth documenting. We'll note what we tested and confirm what's clean.

Yes, as long as you have explicit written permission from the owner. We'll ask for documentation of that permission before starting.

We retain only what's necessary to produce your report. We don't store credentials beyond the engagement, and we don't share findings with anyone except you.